-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve runtime for MIRI emicorr step #8412
Comments
Comment by Tyler Pauly on JIRA: Hi David, I've been assuming the "assigned to Tyler" step to mean that this is ready to be worked, but a dev looking at this might not know where to start. Could we get the further information attached to this ticket? Are there suggested bounds involved in the search, or something else? |
Sorry, it should be ready to be worked within a few days, but to avoid confusion I should probably have assigned it to Michael Regan first until that information is added. I'll reassign. |
Comment by Eddie Bergeron on JIRA: Maria and I did some work on this in the original emicorr ticket: https://jira.stsci.edu/browse/JP-3248 See comments on Dec 19, 2023. I don't know if any of these things were implemented, other than using nbins=500 for 10hz. I don't know if that is handled in the code itself or via optional parameters. however it does sound like we need to implement one of the more sophisticated speed-up algorithms that we talked about (or something else). |
Michael Regan Just checking in to see if you think there's any additional information that would be helpful to include here before sending this ticket over to SCSB? |
Comment by Michael Regan on JIRA: Determining the phase only takes around two cycles. So depending on the frame time. We can set an upper limit of the number of frames for the different emi sources. |
Issue JP-3592 was created on JIRA by David Law:
The MIRI emicorr step seems to be working well, but is much slower than it needs to be, taking upwards of 25 minutes for some LRS TSO data. From talking to Michael Regan it sounds like it should be straight forward to speed it up substantially, since the step does not need to search over all samples in order to get a good measurement of the EMI.
Michael Regan or Eddie Bergeron to provide further information as necessary for modification of the emicorr routine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: