Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bad resample_spec results for MIRI LRS fixed-slit nodded exposures #8484

Closed
stscijgbot-jp opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8511
Closed

Bad resample_spec results for MIRI LRS fixed-slit nodded exposures #8484

stscijgbot-jp opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8511

Comments

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue JP-3624 was created on JIRA by Howard Bushouse:

Help Desk ticket INC0200735 ([https://stsci.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=incident.do?sys_id=21db911a834e8ad05d629da6feaad3fa)] reported an issue with the resample_spec results for obs 5 in program 3786, which is a standard MIRI LRS fixed-slit nodded pair of exposures. Obs 11 in the same program is setup identically and the results for that are fine. The problem appears to be related to the way the output WCS grid is setup for the combined output image from resample_spec, such that the two input (cal) images are being combined on top of one another, without the dither/nod being taken into account. A quick look at the WCS information in the exposures for both obs 5 and 11 shows they are very similar, with all the expected ~1.9 arcsec differences in pointing between the 2 exposures in each observation. So the question is why the 2 exposures from obs 11 are being combined properly, with appropriate shifting/alignment due to the dither offset, while obs 5 is not.

@mcara
Copy link
Member

mcara commented May 27, 2024

What is the relationship between this issue and #8485?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants