-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Databricks 13 support #3334
Comments
Had a look at Spark Connect.
(https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-connect-overview.html) I couldn't get it to work, "remote" is not found as a member of builder. Apparently the More generally, this creates a local spark, which talks to a remote one. Would the point be that the R sessions talks directly to the remote spark? Do we need Spark Connect for that? |
Hi all, this is something that I'm working on at this time. Bottom line is that, at this time, |
Hi all, yesterday I merged the needed changes in |
For reference, I have a tracking document in the repo that contains what's supported and what is not. I'd be curious to see if there's anything there that is not supported by |
There is now a guide to using |
Closing issue now since the new solution, of using |
Starting from Databricks DBR 13 and the associated python package databricks-connect 13.0.0, the connection now use the new Spark Connect.
It seems to change a few things in the connection, and Sparklyr doesn't seems to be compatible.
For example, if I use the traditionnal way to connect, which works with older version, I get this:
I tested this connection and it works in python, my guess is that it's a big change in the internal way to connect that is not compatible with Sparklyr (I have the version 1.8.1).
I expected that seeing it's brand new, but my question is: is there a support planned for this new databricks-connect for Sparklyr ? Or do I have to switch to ODBC (which lack features compared to Sparklyr) ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: