Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OP_RETURN transaction prepare not working on ver 4.0.5 #6761

Closed
massmux opened this issue Nov 22, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

OP_RETURN transaction prepare not working on ver 4.0.5 #6761

massmux opened this issue Nov 22, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@massmux
Copy link

massmux commented Nov 22, 2020

OP_RETURN tx was perfectly working on 4.0.4 while in 4.0.5 it always returns an error with "invalid address or script".

@SomberNight
Copy link
Member

Using Qt? What exactly are you entering into the Pay to line?

E.g. I've just tried this and it worked:

OP_RETURN deadbeef

This also worked:

OP_RETURN deadbeef01, 0
OP_RETURN deadbeef02, 0
OP_RETURN deadbeef03, 0
tb1qc5ztxm2kvtrtxun50v0rn6asm9tv0t3mfzh68v, 0.002
OP_CHECKSIG 02377288c5088673d4fc366efdbfc9f9203430ab1575d98d06d5cf25517366b83f, 0.001

@massmux
Copy link
Author

massmux commented Nov 22, 2020

please see this test screenshot that worked on 4.0.4:
https://postimg.cc/GB9f3zDD
using ubuntu 20.04

@massmux
Copy link
Author

massmux commented Nov 22, 2020

same test on 4.0.4 works
https://postimg.cc/xqj696S1
using ubuntu 20.04

@ecdsa
Copy link
Member

ecdsa commented Nov 23, 2020

I can reproduce.
this is not related to OP_RETURN
the issue is that a single line is not parsed as "pay to many", so you need to type the amount in the amount field.

@massmux
Copy link
Author

massmux commented Nov 24, 2020

Ok i've seen. So with this new version 4.0.5 there is this change compared to the previous one. Ok it was important to know. Thanks

@massmux massmux closed this as completed Nov 24, 2020
@SomberNight
Copy link
Member

this was an unintended side-effect of b955258

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants