Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

请问可以提供各个模型的checkpioint吗? #62

Closed
kelvennn opened this issue Mar 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

请问可以提供各个模型的checkpioint吗? #62

kelvennn opened this issue Mar 16, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@kelvennn
Copy link

GIT等模型计算代价实在太大了

@kelvennn kelvennn added the question Further information is requested label Mar 16, 2023
@Spico197
Copy link
Owner

抱歉,GIT等模型是在合作方机器上训练的。受公司条约限制,我也没办法拿到权重,只能获取到指标结果。

@kelvennn
Copy link
Author

kelvennn commented Mar 16, 2023

好的,谢谢大佬的回复

那我想请问一下还有GIT等模型的训练日志可供参考吗?想知道通过前10epoch猜测比如Doc2EDAG等模型训练速度是否可靠?因为似乎他们的预测、训练的速度受有向图生成影响,在不同的生成EDAG能力下(训练初期与模型具备了可接受的效果)是更快还是更慢呢???

因为前10epoch下,我好像训练GIT比Doc2EDAG更快,哈哈哈

@Spico197
Copy link
Owner

当时做的实验有点多,现在对应不太上了。不过找到了Doc2EDAG和GIT的某次实验结果的日志。硬软件平台是相同的,所以可以做速度对比。这个只是中间某次的试验结果,最终评价部分数值可能和论文中汇报不相符,仅供速度参考。

加油加油加油!

git_training.log
doc2edag_training.log

@kelvennn
Copy link
Author

非常感谢!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants