We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GIT等模型计算代价实在太大了
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
抱歉,GIT等模型是在合作方机器上训练的。受公司条约限制,我也没办法拿到权重,只能获取到指标结果。
Sorry, something went wrong.
好的,谢谢大佬的回复
那我想请问一下还有GIT等模型的训练日志可供参考吗?想知道通过前10epoch猜测比如Doc2EDAG等模型训练速度是否可靠?因为似乎他们的预测、训练的速度受有向图生成影响,在不同的生成EDAG能力下(训练初期与模型具备了可接受的效果)是更快还是更慢呢???
因为前10epoch下,我好像训练GIT比Doc2EDAG更快,哈哈哈
当时做的实验有点多,现在对应不太上了。不过找到了Doc2EDAG和GIT的某次实验结果的日志。硬软件平台是相同的,所以可以做速度对比。这个只是中间某次的试验结果,最终评价部分数值可能和论文中汇报不相符,仅供速度参考。
加油加油加油!
git_training.log doc2edag_training.log
非常感谢!
No branches or pull requests
GIT等模型计算代价实在太大了
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: