-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
qc report to display manual segmentation #4488
Comments
You can use sct_qc -i ${file}.nii.gz -s ${file_seg}.nii.gz -d ${file_lesion}.nii.gz -p sct_deepseg_lesion -plane sagittal -qc ${PATH_QC} -qc-subject ${SUBJECT}
|
Ok thanks! 1- But is there a way to generate the sct qc report from manual segmentation that is not on spinal cord images (I really like the interface and think from a more general perspective e.g. manual segmentation of brain tumors)? 2- Also, in this command line, I must have processed the images using sct (sct_deepseg_lesion) : is there a way to generate the qc report without image processing in sct? (e.g. just to overlay the manual segmentation mask with the image?) |
The spinal cord mask (provided by the arg
No, you can directly provide manual lesion segmentation for arg |
Hmm, good question. Maybe you can try to dilate (
Yes, this is expected because You can try to check this issue and this PR and try to do some experiments with |
Given that the scope of this issue is covered by: I think we can close this issue? |
Hi,
Feature justification: Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to use the sct_qc function to generate a qc report that displays manual segmentations after completing manual segmentation tasks.
Describe the solution you'd like*
If it does not already exist, I think it would be great to have a function like sct_qc -i source_image.nii.gz -mask mask.nii.gz (where source_image.nii.gz is the source image from a dataset and mask.nii.gz the mask that has been obtained with manual segmentation) that generate a qc report making able to navigate through the images for quick assessment of the accuracy of manual segmentations.
Describe alternatives you've considered
How can we easily qc manual segmentation images? (instead of using manual correction script and iterate through cases, for example....)
Additional context
N/A.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: