Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we drop support for python 2.X ? #475

Closed
almet opened this issue Sep 24, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Should we drop support for python 2.X ? #475

almet opened this issue Sep 24, 2019 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@almet
Copy link
Member

almet commented Sep 24, 2019

Hi,

I'm wondering if we should drop support for python2.X series, and eventually modernize a bit the codebase accordingly.

What do you think?

@Glandos
Copy link
Member

Glandos commented Sep 24, 2019

Since every major distribution have Python 3 in them (CentOS 8 is out!), Python 2 can be safely dropped.

To me, the minimal version should 3.5, but 3.6 is nice with f-strings.

@almet
Copy link
Member Author

almet commented Sep 25, 2019

I believe having 3.6 (or even 3.7 ?) as a target would be sane. IHM is not packaged yet on any distribution, so I believe it would be okay to ask people who want to install IHM to deploy a recent version of python? (not sure, but that's a wild guess)

@zorun
Copy link
Collaborator

zorun commented Sep 25, 2019

Dropping support for python2 is a good idea!

Regarding python3, this was discussed in #421, and I still believe that compatibility with python 3.5 is important.
The end-of-life for python 3.5 is still one year away (2020-09-13): https://devguide.python.org/
Same thing for Debian stretch, it is still supported until 2020 at least.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants