Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

slf4j + logback + splunk 6.2.3 - TcpAppender is not working #21

Closed
alexterman opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

slf4j + logback + splunk 6.2.3 - TcpAppender is not working #21

alexterman opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@alexterman
Copy link

I tried following versions:
logback-classic-1.1.3.jar
logback-core-1.1.3.jar
slf4j-api-1.7.13.jar
splunk-library-javalogging-1.5.0.jar

and also
logback-classic-1.0.13.jar
logback-core-1.0.13.jar
slf4j-api-1.7.5.jar
splunk-library-javalogging-1.5.0.jar

but was not able to see my logs in splunk (I used exact configurations as in README here).
The run() of the TcpAppender is never called for some reason.

With log4j 2.1 it is perfectly working, but not with logback.

@kob-aha
Copy link

kob-aha commented Dec 31, 2015

It is related to issue #16. I had the same problem and downgrading to logback 1.0.13 solved it.

@shakeelmohamed
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @alexterman,

Do you need this relatively soon, or can you work off of the changes from #16 in the develop branch?

@alexterman
Copy link
Author

Hi @shakeelmohamed ,

Thanks for quick response.
I moved to a log4j implementation currently, so no rush.
Once you will release a new version I will take it.

BTW when approximately you are planning that?

@JonMR
Copy link

JonMR commented Feb 11, 2016

What's the plan to get this into a release?

@glennblock
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for reporting this @alexterman. I am looking into how we can get this released.

@shakeelmohamed
Copy link
Contributor

Hi folks, we've released v1.5.1. Let us know if that solves your issues!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants