Add @Name support for value object binding

[philwebb]

Currently the ValueObjectBinder uses the parameter name when binding properties. This works well in most situations, but prevents us from using Java reserved words as property names. It would be helpful to offer an annotation so that the property name can be defined independently of the parameter name.

[snicoll]

Reopening as the @Name annotation should be processed by the Configuration Metadata AP to generate the intended property name.