Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jens Schauder opened DATAJDBC-464 and commented
A parameter of a method should get converted to the default JDBC compatible type just as the attribute of an entity does
Referenced from: pull request #186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Jens Schauder commented
I think the logic for determining the correct target type should be moved out of the RelationalPersistentProperty and into the conversion and work with the dialect so we can support different sets of supported types for different JDBC drivers
RelationalPersistentProperty
Sorry, something went wrong.
schauder
No branches or pull requests
Jens Schauder opened DATAJDBC-464 and commented
A parameter of a method should get converted to the default JDBC compatible type just as the attribute of an entity does
Referenced from: pull request #186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: