Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add transactionManager property to @Transactional configuration [SPR-6283] #10950

Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Oct 29, 2009 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator

Niklas Saers opened SPR-6283 and commented

Hi guys,
When I write my tests I can say "@TransactionConfiguration(transactionManager="transactionManager", defaultRollback=true)". It would be great to have the transactionManager part available, either as a similar @TransactionConfiguration annotation, or as a property on @Transactional. Right now it's non-trivial to use multiple transaction managers like I have when dealing with multiple legacy databases from within the same Spring application

Cheers

Nik

Affects: 3.0 RC1

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Juergen Hoeller commented

Since 3.0 M4, @Transactional supports a qualifier value for choosing between multiple transaction managers. This works similar to autowiring qualifiers, with the value either matching a <qualifier> entry in the transaction manager bean definition, or simply the bean name directly.

Juergen

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added type: enhancement A general enhancement in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) labels Jan 11, 2019
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added this to the 3.0 M4 milestone Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants