Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

java.lang.Object should count as a simple property, at least from the autowiring perspective [SPR-6600] #11266

Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue Dec 22, 2009 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator

Alex Wei opened SPR-6600 and commented

Spring would try to autowire a property if the property type is java.lang.Object, and throw the UnsatisfiedDependencyException because every single bean is a candidate for autowiring.
java.lang.Object probably should be treated as a simple property type like String, URI, URL and enum etc, so that Spring won't try to autowire a property of type java.lang.Object.


Affects: 2.5.5

Referenced from: commits 572abbc

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Juergen Hoeller commented

Good point. As of Spring 3.0.1, we explicitly do not consider Object as a candidate type for autowiring by type.

Juergen

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added type: enhancement A general enhancement in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) labels Jan 11, 2019
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added this to the 3.0.1 milestone Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants