You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #673, the exceptionHandler property was introduced into the AbstractWSSecurityInterceptor.
This creates an inconsistency with the overall exceptionhandling architecture in Spring WS.
Instead of introducing the EndpointExceptionResolver in this Interceptor, would it not be better to just let the exception flow up to the MessageDispatcher, where the resolvers already are configured (with sensible defaults)
In my opinion this could be done for both the client and endpoint handleRequest/handleResponse methods by just removing the catch clauses.
I would be happy to contribute a patch for this if needed.
Affects: 1.5.7, 2.0 M3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The problem here is that we'd like any security exception to result in a security-specific SOAP Fault by default. We can't do that in the default configuration of the MessageDispatcher (or exception resolvers), since the specific exceptions (WsSecurityValidationException and WsSecurityFaultException) are part of the spring-ws-security module.
So I agree that this is architecturally inconsistent, but I don't see any nice way out. Also note that we can't break backwards compatibility here.
Paul Nyheim opened SWS-648 and commented
In #673, the exceptionHandler property was introduced into the
AbstractWSSecurityInterceptor.
This creates an inconsistency with the overall exceptionhandling architecture in Spring WS.
Instead of introducing the EndpointExceptionResolver in this Interceptor, would it not be better to just let the exception flow up to the MessageDispatcher, where the resolvers already are configured (with sensible defaults)
And as this is not documented anywhere unlike the exception resolving in the MessageDispatcher (http://static.springsource.org/spring-ws/sites/1.5/reference/html/server.html#server-endpoint-exception-resolver), it is too easy to miss out on or forget this extra configuration step.
In my opinion this could be done for both the client and endpoint handleRequest/handleResponse methods by just removing the catch clauses.
I would be happy to contribute a patch for this if needed.
Affects: 1.5.7, 2.0 M3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: