We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
So, the photo image quality supplied by the imageUrl method is extremely low.
This can be changed by changing the url from this
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UyuMuAWmKIM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAn0/pMK2DzFNBNI/s64/photo.jpg
to say
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UyuMuAWmKIM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAn0/pMK2DzFNBNI/s800/photo.jpg
or
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UyuMuAWmKIM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAn0/pMK2DzFNBNI/s64/photo.jpg?sz=800
I would suggest adding an extra method that allows for this larger image retrieval. Because 64px is very hard to use these days.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
So, the photo image quality supplied by the imageUrl method is extremely low.
This can be changed by changing the url from this
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UyuMuAWmKIM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAn0/pMK2DzFNBNI/s64/photo.jpg
to say
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UyuMuAWmKIM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAn0/pMK2DzFNBNI/s800/photo.jpg
or
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-UyuMuAWmKIM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAn0/pMK2DzFNBNI/s64/photo.jpg?sz=800
I would suggest adding an extra method that allows for this larger image retrieval. Because 64px is very hard to use these days.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: