Add a "performance" section

[hollsk]

I propose a "performance" section to contain the following existing files:

• advertising
• images
• graded browser support
• progressive enhancement

Is this idea awesome Y/N?

[jpw]

Is this idea awesome Y/N?

[tulipdexter]

I'm not sure I'd instinctively think about graded browser support and progressive enhancement as being under the umbrella of 'performance'.

[hollsk]

Yeah, i had the same thought @davidpauljunior - but I couldn't think of anything more appropriate.

• They don't belong in markup or accessibility
• Both are distinct (& related) technical approaches, but they're not really architecture, exactly

Can you think of a category they could be contained by?

[jpw]

general concencus here to leave everything in the root unless > 1 related thing, then folder

don't know if this answers the question lol

[hollsk]

As per catchup:

• everyone agrees that GBS and PE don't strictly belong in performance
• we agreed that it's fine to leave pages uncategorised if there's no logical grouping
• general decision made to leave everything in the root unless > 1 related thing, then folder