You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In did:pkh:eth (to become did:pkh:eip155 in #279 & #286), ssi's implementation uses verification method id #Recovery2020, but the did:pkh spec says it should be #blockchainAccountId. @ceramicnetwork (@oed)'s implementation ceramicnetwork/js-ceramic#1624 is using the #blockchainAccountId form with did:pkh:eip155.
An implementation could possibly allow both by having the same verification method object twice with different ids.
But maybe since these changes are not yet merged, it would be simpler to change ssi/did-pkh to use #blockchainAccountId with did:pkh:eip155 (and leave did:pkh:eth unchanged).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In
did:pkh:eth
(to becomedid:pkh:eip155
in #279 & #286),ssi
's implementation uses verification method id#Recovery2020
, but thedid:pkh
spec says it should be#blockchainAccountId
.@ceramicnetwork (@oed)'s implementation ceramicnetwork/js-ceramic#1624 is using the
#blockchainAccountId
form withdid:pkh:eip155
.An implementation could possibly allow both by having the same verification method object twice with different ids.
But maybe since these changes are not yet merged, it would be simpler to change
ssi
/did-pkh
to use#blockchainAccountId
withdid:pkh:eip155
(and leavedid:pkh:eth
unchanged).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: