You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would be an interesting idea, I have prepared a demo notebook with a nasty xml response to parse from amazon ;)
As you can see the dataset fulfillment_order is unique, but still it is saved in a list, just with one element. It would be nice if you can say with an identifier, that that dataset is unique and won't be stored in a list, instead in a normal dictionary.
UNIQUE_DATASET is my proposal for a name for such a identifier.
Otherwise, the possibility to flatten all one-element lists in the output would be also interesting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be an interesting idea, I have prepared a demo notebook with a nasty xml response to parse from amazon ;)
As you can see the dataset
fulfillment_order
is unique, but still it is saved in a list, just with one element. It would be nice if you can say with an identifier, that that dataset is unique and won't be stored in a list, instead in a normal dictionary.UNIQUE_DATASET
is my proposal for a name for such a identifier.Otherwise, the possibility to flatten all one-element lists in the output would be also interesting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: