You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(Side note: This \.py\.orig$ makes sense as an extra default for find in files produced by git when rebasing merging)
The issue with the exclude textbox is that it is very limited as more and more things are added. I think exclude should be a two column table, where each row had one entry and the column had a description, so that users can add comments to specific patterns of exclusion. Also this makes the list/table usable when we start adding more exclusion patterns. Also the exclusion patterns right now are python based, moving towards python agnosticism will require more and more patterns and this will make the lineedit unusable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We added a simpler way to exclude files in 3.x and this is going to be applied to the file names only. I doubt we're going to do something more about this in the future.
(Side note: This
\.py\.orig$
makes sense as an extra default for find in files produced by git when rebasing merging)The issue with the exclude textbox is that it is very limited as more and more things are added. I think exclude should be a two column table, where each row had one entry and the column had a description, so that users can add comments to specific patterns of exclusion. Also this makes the list/table usable when we start adding more exclusion patterns. Also the exclusion patterns right now are python based, moving towards python agnosticism will require more and more patterns and this will make the lineedit unusable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: