Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Stop using mining rank when recommending apps #224

Open
njordhov opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Stop using mining rank when recommending apps #224

njordhov opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@njordhov
Copy link

njordhov commented Jan 23, 2020

What is the problem you are seeing? Please describe.

The original, core idea of App Mining were "aiming to build an algorithmic, automated mechanism for evaluating app quality that could also distribute monthly rewards for app developers."

What we have learned is that high rank in app mining does not imply than an app is of high quality as perceived by the users and the community. Yet rank is used to showcase the top apps.

How is this problem misaligned with goals of app mining?

Users and the community are disappointed about the quality of apps. They find top apps that are perceived to be of inadequate quality.

What is the explicit recommendation you’re looking to propose?

Use other criteria than rank in app mining when recommending apps to users, such as selections of apps vetted by the community.

Describe your long term considerations in proposing this change. Please include the ways you can predict this recommendation could go wrong and possible ways mitigate.

Factoring out quality assessment allows using other targets than app quality to guide the app mining algorithm, providing flexibility moving forward.

We are not limited to "design a ranking system that rewards apps that deliver a high-quality user experience" but can design a reward system that produces quality apps without making it the ranking criteria.

Additional context

#223 Stakeholder analysis
#219 App mining with two tiers

@njordhov njordhov changed the title Separate quality assessment from app mining Stop using mining rank when recommending apps Jan 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant