You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The bug fixed by #4361 could have been caught if, as part of our release process, we (1) ran the mock-miner for a long-ish duration (e.g. 1 week), (2) stored all the blocks it produced, and (3) replayed them against the current release to ensure that they are all valid. To address this, we'd need to:
Update the mock-miner to store its blocks (preferably in a separate DB or directory)
Merge the branch test/replay-block and ilk to master
Extend test/replay-block so that it can take a block that does not yet exist in the chainstate (e.g. from the mock miner)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
saralab
changed the title
[Release process] Store mock-mined blocks and replay them
Beta Testnet - [Release process] Store mock-mined blocks and replay them
Apr 30, 2024
saralab
changed the title
Beta Testnet - [Release process] Store mock-mined blocks and replay them
PreLaunch Testnet - [Release process] Store mock-mined blocks and replay them
Jun 5, 2024
The bug fixed by #4361 could have been caught if, as part of our release process, we (1) ran the mock-miner for a long-ish duration (e.g. 1 week), (2) stored all the blocks it produced, and (3) replayed them against the current release to ensure that they are all valid. To address this, we'd need to:
test/replay-block
and ilk tomaster
test/replay-block
so that it can take a block that does not yet exist in the chainstate (e.g. from the mock miner)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: