Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Collection of minor improvements #270

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

fweber144
Copy link
Collaborator

These are multiple minor improvements. Sorry that I had to collect them into one PR again, but I couldn't find a sensible other way for submitting these changes (one PR per minor change would certainly have been overkill). I guess you need to check the commits here one-by-one to see if you want to accept them. Details may be found in the commit messages.

…a `datafit` (the value of zero is probably correct).
consistent and easier to understand for beginners).
…tion of

the **brms** tests in case of **brms** version <= 2.16.1 can be removed.
consistency with the other `weights()` call which calls `loo::weights.importance_sampling()` in the background).
`cvfits` and `cvfun` are `NULL`. The reason is that `.get_kfold()` already
throws such a warning and throwing an error in `init_refmodel()` would mean that
a reference model which is never used for K-fold CV would require `cvfits` or
`cvfun` nonetheless.
…dapt the decision of

the final submodel size to the new results.
versions > 1.6.1 don't print the tibble correctly.
@fweber144
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fweber144 commented Jan 30, 2022

I just pushed some more commits (b07bf3e to 01682fb). I hope this is ok.

EDIT: Also pushed 369aa86 and 8f6c8eb.

…two parts may also be entangled with each other."

I'm not sure why I included it. We have `.get_submodels()` always called after `select()`, so the two parts are always separated. Perhaps I was thinking of the `refit_prj = FALSE` case, but that doesn't make sense either.
@AlejandroCatalina AlejandroCatalina merged commit 4014001 into stan-dev:develop Feb 9, 2022
@fweber144 fweber144 deleted the xaxis_lab_etc branch February 9, 2022 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants