Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flatpak support #106

Closed
skobkin opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Flatpak support #106

skobkin opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@skobkin
Copy link

skobkin commented Jun 13, 2023

Currently there are very limited set of app packages for Linux.

To make it more widely known and make installation on any distribution easier, I'd suggest to add Flatpak support and publish it on Flathub.

@staniel359 staniel359 self-assigned this Jun 13, 2023
@staniel359
Copy link
Owner

@skobkin Hello.
I can add Flatpak version to releases, but I don't know if it should be published to Flathub.
I personally don't publish the app anywhere else except GitHub as it would be harder for me to maintain all the platforms.
In that case this should also be published to Mac App Store, which is quite complicated, I suppose.
So I simply deal only with GitHub.

@skobkin
Copy link
Author

skobkin commented Jun 13, 2023

It'd be better than nothing.
But I'm not sure if it's really impossible to publish releases using Github Actions.

@staniel359
Copy link
Owner

staniel359 commented Jun 13, 2023

@skobkin
Copy link
Author

skobkin commented Jun 13, 2023

@staniel359 I don't see how it's related to Flathub, but if you're sure that it's possible, then I don't see a reason why not to do that 🤷

UPD: I mean publishing releases to Flathub of course.

@staniel359
Copy link
Owner

@skobkin Sorry, misunderstood you.

I'll add a Flatpack version anyway, and maybe someone will publish it to Flathub.

@skobkin
Copy link
Author

skobkin commented Jun 13, 2023

@staniel359 As far as I understood, they're not very fond of packages published not by authors.
So I'm not sure if it'll be allowed. But we'll see.

@staniel359
Copy link
Owner

@skobkin I see. Thanks for the information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants