Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Quorum vs. All in Accept #7

Closed
hengxin opened this issue Aug 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Quorum vs. All in Accept #7

hengxin opened this issue Aug 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@hengxin @Starydark
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
TLA+ for PaxosStore TLAPS for PaxosStore

Comments

@hengxin
Copy link
Collaborator

hengxin commented Aug 14, 2019

Using "All" vs. "Quorum" in Accept(p, b, v) in UniversalPaxosStore.

See the error-trace: RefineEV-3P3B3V-Quorum-vs-All-ErrorTrace

Check the theorem.
@hengxin hengxin added the question Further information is requested label Aug 14, 2019
@hengxin hengxin added this to To do in TLA+ for PaxosStore via automation Aug 14, 2019
@hengxin hengxin added this to To do in TLAPS for PaxosStore via automation Aug 14, 2019
@hengxin hengxin closed this as completed Sep 10, 2019
TLA+ for PaxosStore automation moved this from To do to Done Sep 10, 2019
TLAPS for PaxosStore automation moved this from To do to Done Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hengxin hengxin

@Starydark Starydark

Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
TLA+ for PaxosStore
  
Done
TLAPS for PaxosStore
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hengxin @Starydark