Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quarto Site #28

Closed
saforem2 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Quarto Site #28

saforem2 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@saforem2
Copy link
Contributor

saforem2 commented Feb 21, 2024

Hey @stas00 ,

I added a comment on my previous PR:

@stas00 if you're curious, I've done some re-org and tried rendering everything with Quarto in my fork

You can see it online at:

https://saforem2.github.io/ml-engineering/

This is mostly just a first (rough) pass (and copied + modified from existing Quarto sites I've made),
but I made an effort to fix / change things where appropriate (e.g. links, etc.)

disclaimer: I mostly just did this out of personal curiosity / testing, but thought I'd share incase you're interested 🤷🏻‍♂️

I know that I, personally have a hard time keeping track of GitHub comments ( especially on closed PRs 😂 ),
so I figured it probably made more sense to move the discussion to a separate issue (I hope that's okay)

@stas00
Copy link
Owner

stas00 commented Feb 21, 2024

Hi Sam,

Sorry, I'm not quite following you here. Why are you doing this work?

Is something wrong with the current repo?

@saforem2
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I'm not quite following you here. Why are you doing this work?

Honestly I just wanted to

  • see / test some automation scripts for converting (+ formatting) **/*.md to **/*.qmd that I've been working on
  • test Quarto on a larger (book-like) site with multiple pages and look at some of the organizational aspects for a larger project

and this seemed like a good fit 🤷🏻‍♂️

Is something wrong with the current repo?

no not at all!

to be honest I initially planned to just play with it locally and keep it to myself,
but figured I'd push the changes back to my fork before scrapping it

@stas00
Copy link
Owner

stas00 commented Feb 21, 2024

Thank you for clarifying, Sam.

As I mentioned in the other thread I actually prefer to have it done in 2 stages with intermediary html because then I have far more control over the output and can deploy existing tools that work with html - e.g. I check links using linkchecker and I'm very familiar with as I have been using it for year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants