New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: Item Response Theory/Models - categorical PCA/FA #4153
Comments
bump https://github.com/pluralsight/irt_parameter_estimation/tree/master however, De Boeck et al, and similar articles directly put it into the GLMM framework De Boeck, Paul, and Mark Wilson, eds. Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach. New York, NY: Springer, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3990-9. Kim, Frank B. Baker, Seock-Ho, ed. Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques, Second Edition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482276725. Aside: we need "prediction" for the values of individual random effects (person ability) semi-random list of articles mainly using mixed models: Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates. “Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items.” Journal of Memory and Language, Special Issue: Emerging Data Analysis, 59, no. 4 (November 1, 2008): 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005. Chalmers, R. Philip. “Extended Mixed-Effects Item Response Models With the MH-RM Algorithm.” Journal of Educational Measurement 52, no. 2 (2015): 200–222. De Boeck, Paul. “Random Item IRT Models.” Psychometrika 73, no. 4 (December 1, 2008): 533–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9092-x. Kim, Jinho, and Mark Wilson. “Polytomous Item Explanatory Item Response Theory Models.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 80, no. 4 (August 1, 2020): 726–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419892667. Locker, Lawrence, Lesa Hoffman, and James A. Bovaird. “On the Use of Multilevel Modeling as an Alternative to Items Analysis in Psycholinguistic Research.” Behavior Research Methods 39, no. 4 (November 1, 2007): 723–30. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192962. Rose, Norman, Gabriel Nagy, Benjamin Nagengast, Andreas Frey, and Michael Becker. “Modeling Multiple Item Context Effects With Generalized Linear Mixed Models.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00248. a recent comparison of methods: |
other python packages that include IRT: and there are other, Bayesian focused packages |
(mainly to get started with an issue and to park two links)
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/252317/similarities-and-differences-between-irt-model-and-logistic-regression-model
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/215404/is-there-factor-analysis-or-pca-for-ordinal-or-binary-data
I saw it mentioned several times in the PCA and factor analysis literature as alternative when variables are categorical or mixed instead of continuous.
Browsing a bit for the underlying statistical methods (given what little I know):
So, we need to add some extensions and new models, but IRT might also provide test cases for the generic, not application specific models.
There are some articles and books that make directly the link to mixed effects GLM. Most of the general IRT literature is more on the application to multiple-choice testing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: