Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statsmodels 0.10.0 #5330

Closed
francesco91910 opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Statsmodels 0.10.0 #5330

francesco91910 opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@francesco91910
Copy link

Hi all,

Do you know when the statsmodels package version 0.10.0 will be released as final version?

Thanks,
Francesco

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure.
I'm about a month behind in my work for statsmodels. So I would guess now that it will be more like end of November.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Contributor

Is this estimate still in the ballpark?

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

More likely the ball will be far out of the park.

I was thinking about it last weekend.
I still will not have any serious amount of time to work on a release. GAM is essentially finished as a mergable first version except for a few loose ends.
But personal/family time requirements are still large. My wife and I bought a house towards the end of summer that needed 3 or 4 months of repairs and renovation. We are moving during Christmas break.
GAM was 3 times as much work as I had expected plus organizing the home repairs and move took much more time than I had expected or hoped for.

The options are to either get a rush 0.10rc1 out with just the basic work necessary for a release, or delay the release to end of January, so I have at least 3 or 4 weeks to work on it.

We should have made a bug fix 0.9.1, because new versions always take longer than expected/planned.

In terms of wishful thinking, PRs that are close:
I have GAM, plus at least two PRs from the end of summer.
Kerby also has at least two PRs that need some review and maybe a bit of refactoring for the process PR.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Contributor

OK, well consider this the traditional/periodic offer to help. I'd be +1 on a 9.1 even if it were expected to be short-lived.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Contributor

ping on the offer to help with smaller, more regular/frequent releases.

@bashtage
Copy link
Member

bashtage commented Jun 8, 2019

The release candidate is now out. See #5845 for installation instructions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants