You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using now Monte Carlo simulations to check how good hypothesis tests are.
AFAIK, we don't have anything to compute the theoretical noncentrality parameter for a parametrically specified model DGP used in simulations.
example
The return of Hosmer-Lemeshow type test for poisson includes several estimates of nc.
Test method delegates to statsmodels.stats.diagnostic_gen.test_chisquare_binning
Why is nc_umvue negative and much smaller than the other estimates?
I guess the theoretical nc=0 in this simulations which is under the null of correct specification.
noncentrality = <class 'statsmodels.tools.testing.Holder'>
nc = 0.0
confint = array([1.0000000000000e-100, 8.0294528361405e+000])
nc_umvue = -1.8074724688857908
nc_lzd = 0.5320879218523682
nc_krs = 0.9121507231754883
nc_median = 1e-100
name = 'Noncentrality for chisquare-distributed random variable'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm using now Monte Carlo simulations to check how good hypothesis tests are.
AFAIK, we don't have anything to compute the theoretical noncentrality parameter for a parametrically specified model DGP used in simulations.
example
The return of Hosmer-Lemeshow type test for poisson includes several estimates of
nc
.Test method delegates to statsmodels.stats.diagnostic_gen.test_chisquare_binning
Why is
nc_umvue
negative and much smaller than the other estimates?I guess the theoretical nc=0 in this simulations which is under the null of correct specification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: