Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release 0.6 #912

Closed
11 of 25 tasks
josef-pkt opened this issue Jun 25, 2013 · 9 comments
Closed
11 of 25 tasks

release 0.6 #912

josef-pkt opened this issue Jun 25, 2013 · 9 comments
Milestone

Comments

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

ticket to keep milestone 0.6 open

What should still go into 0.6? What needs to be fixed?

update release notes and docs

open PR or issues

I changed the milestone to 0.7 on several PRs

Bugs

and a few more PRs left with milestone 0.6


items to check that they are in release notes

  • sequence of PRs with bug fixes, refactorings in GLM, especially offset and exposure MAINT: GLM #1734
@rgbkrk
Copy link

rgbkrk commented Sep 10, 2014

Hey there! When are you all expecting to release 0.6?

We were hoping to include this in IPython's Docker images for the scipystack as part of this PR: jupyter/docker-notebook#9, but noticed that 0.5 does not build in Python 3.4 (while the master branch does).

/cc @takluyver

@jseabold
Copy link
Member

We are discussing. Hope to cut a RC asap.

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member Author

I'd like to get in these two #1927 #1929 It will take me a few hours tonight or tomorrow

I'd like this one #1433 probplots, but I have no idea what the status is. (I don't know whether the current code doesn't have any bugs left, that should get resolved with #1433.) It will take a few hours writing examples in a notebook to see how well it works.

I think it's too late for almost all of the other PRs. (I decided a month ago not to work through those, if we want to release fast.)

There are a few other issues that should/could get in, maybe even between rc and release.
One is to raise an exception on object arrays, as a temporary fix until we have full dtype handling.

I'm waiting for 0.6 to be out of the way to do more merging of larger PRs, hoping for a quick 0.7

(unit root is unfortunate, and I'd like to get half way through #1849 but adfuller is too popular to change things around without being sure about backwards compatibility. I haven't looked at unitroot in more than a month.)

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member Author

another one: no specific issue open yet: MixedLM is missing the ResultsWrapper.

[Edit: #1990]

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member Author

and smaller bugs like #1969 #1434

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member Author

another one #1901 numpy compatibility

@stonebig
Copy link

Hi josef-pkt,

Thanks for this awesome work. I would be glad if you could release 0.6 this week, as I can only get 0.5 at this point (as relying on Christoph Gohlke binaries).

@jseabold
Copy link
Member

I'm going to finish checking the release docs and tag the release candidate today.

@jseabold
Copy link
Member

The release candidate is tagged and available on PyPi. Please give it a spin.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants