You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The latest Git tag in this repository is bravura-1.392, which is marked in GitHub as a pre-release beta for SMuFL 1.4. Since then, SMuFL 1.4 has been released, and the announcement says that "SMuFL 1.4 is implemented by version 1.392 of the Bravura reference font".
However, I see in the history that Bravura Text 1.392 used an incorrect style name, which was corrected to Regular in 3df1714 as a version 1.393.
It would be a great help as a distro packager of Bravura if we could have a bravura-1.393 tag for commit 3df1714.
I also see that commit 3df1714 did not create a Bravura 1.393 (as opposed to Bravura Text). This is less of an issue for me personally, but, if it isn't too much trouble, it might be even better to add a new commit to be tagged bravura-1.400 updating the versions of both fonts. This would:
clearly communicate that the fonts are out of beta; and
make it obvious that the Bravura and Bravura Text releases go together.
Thanks for the lovely font and for all of the work on SMuFL!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, you’re quite right that there hasn’t been an official Bravura release following the SMuFL 1.4 release. Sorry about that! There are a couple of mop-up tasks that also need to be done on the fonts, and I will try to prioritise them in the next week or two.
The latest Git tag in this repository is
bravura-1.392
, which is marked in GitHub as a pre-release beta for SMuFL 1.4. Since then, SMuFL 1.4 has been released, and the announcement says that "SMuFL 1.4 is implemented by version 1.392 of the Bravura reference font".However, I see in the history that Bravura Text 1.392 used an incorrect style name, which was corrected to
Regular
in 3df1714 as a version 1.393.It would be a great help as a distro packager of Bravura if we could have a
bravura-1.393
tag for commit 3df1714.I also see that commit 3df1714 did not create a Bravura 1.393 (as opposed to Bravura Text). This is less of an issue for me personally, but, if it isn't too much trouble, it might be even better to add a new commit to be tagged
bravura-1.400
updating the versions of both fonts. This would:Thanks for the lovely font and for all of the work on SMuFL!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: