Notes from awhile ago.

VsSubversion.markdown

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+
+Svn
+===
+
+ * pro: Monotic rev numbers (though commitnumbers is better as they don't change with the whole repo)
+ * pro: Cherry picking doesn't duplicate the commit
+ * pro: Good/faster trac integration
+ * pro: Inherently flattened branches (requires branch.name.rebase+pending preservemerges--or `pull`)
+ * con: allows anti-social change hoarding of one large commit
+ * con: lots of .svn meta folders (slows down Eclipse)
+ * con: looses data in rename+merge scenario
+ * con: allows pushing from an out-of-date working copy as long as specific files don't conflict
+
+Git
+===
+
+ * pro: index (easier to break up commits, see only conflicts during merging)
+ * pro: stash (or local WIP on multiple branches without separate working copies)
+ * pro: local commits
+ * pro: combined diffs in gitk and commit emails
+ * pro: "git diff" in conflicted merges only shows conflicts, not what merged cleanly
+ * pro: safe merging (working copy is not munged, always have ORIG_HEAD or reflog)
+ * pro: pre-filled-in merge commit messages (e.g. with what conflicted)
+ * pro: DAG visualization (gitk)
+ * pro: just one .git meta folder
+ * con: requires flags/prefer-rebase script to maintain flattened branches
+ * con: allows anti-social change hoarding of many small commits
+ * con: no good tattoo (fixed with commitnumbers)
+ * con: trac integration is slow
+