You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here is how a composite brace looks with the Menlo font:
⎫
⎪
⎬
⎪
⎭
And here is how it looks with STIX Two Math:
It seems there are two issues with the STIX version.
First, the upper hook is not completely visible. Second, if we manually move the whole construction somewhat below to workaround this, we can see the construction is divided into "levels" unevenly:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can you let us know in what software you are experiencing this? Are you manually creating a composite brace from the legacy Unicode part characters? Is that necessary? STIX Two Math has been primarily developed around math handlers that dynamically compose braces of appropriate height from } and { characters.
I’ll review the height alignments and overshoots of the old composite part glyphs.
Here is how a composite brace looks with the Menlo font:
And here is how it looks with STIX Two Math:
It seems there are two issues with the STIX version.
First, the upper hook is not completely visible. Second, if we manually move the whole construction somewhat below to workaround this, we can see the construction is divided into "levels" unevenly:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: