Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filling out multiple quests with the same answers quickly #826

Closed
smichel17 opened this issue Feb 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Filling out multiple quests with the same answers quickly #826

smichel17 opened this issue Feb 2, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@smichel17
Copy link
Member

smichel17 commented Feb 2, 2018

Some areas have many roads next to each other that share many characteristics. The most common example I can think of is marking the surface of a neighborhood's roads that are all asphalt. It would be really nice if there were some way for me to answer, "This road is exactly the same as the last 3 roads I tagged" without having to click through the same dialogs over and over.

I seldom go on a trip for the explicit purpose of tagging with StreetComplete. Rather, I do it when I have a minute of down time while I'm out for some other reason. Speed of entry has a dramatic impact on the number of quests I am able or willing to complete before I get bored/frustrated and move on to the next thing.

I am not quite sure how a UI for this should be. I could imagine two ways:

  1. A single action to answer multiple quests that share an answer.
  2. A quick way to answer "same as last" or "same as neighboring street".
    • Could be for a single quest or for multiple characteristics.
@matkoniecz
Copy link
Member

matkoniecz commented Feb 3, 2018

A quick way to answer "same as last"

I think it was proposed already but quick search failed to find a ticket. Recent update of how surface is selected reduced need for it (this change is not yet released).

A single action to answer multiple quests that share an answer.

duplicate of #274, #264, #73, #149

@smichel17
Copy link
Member Author

smichel17 commented Feb 3, 2018

I should have searched first. I'll close this in favor of #76 and partially #124.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants