Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

building:levels=2, roof:levels=1 both set to 1 in OSM. #27

Closed
johnwhelan opened this issue Mar 25, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed

building:levels=2, roof:levels=1 both set to 1 in OSM. #27

johnwhelan opened this issue Mar 25, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@johnwhelan
Copy link

No description provided.

@westnordost
Copy link
Member

As can be seen here

The app asks for the total levels, inclusive roofs. So if you specify 2 in this field and one for the roof, you have building:levels=1 and roof:levels=1 in the end in OSM.

@johnwhelan
Copy link
Author

I think the idea would be to use it with untrained or disposable users. ie normally building levels refers to the number of floors. Can it be misunderstood?

Also the white type on a blue background is easy to read. the grey type below might need glasses for an elderly volunteer.

Bjenk has a particular project in mind and for that one it has to be English and French and robust. The user interface is particularly good.

Can we filter the quests? That way we would only have to explain one thing at a time. Opening hours is more complex for example. We have 300,000 buildings we're interested in. Some more than others.

@westnordost
Copy link
Member

Please stick to one topic per issue, otherwise it gets messy.

I don't know if it can be understood. I wrote it, so I understand. Did you misunderstand it? Can the wording be changed so that it is more clear?

@johnwhelan
Copy link
Author

johnwhelan commented Mar 26, 2017 via email

@johnwhelan
Copy link
Author

1720 Caminiti Crescent ottawa K4A 1M1 Canada is an example that is awkward. three levels but one is in the sloping roof attics.

building:levels should be 3 in OSM agreed? but what should roof:levels be in OSM? How would you enter this in streetcomplete to get the desired result in OSM? Thanks John

@westnordost
Copy link
Member

It's this one, right?: OpenStreetMap, Google Maps

Well, I'd say it has 3 levels in total, 2 of these are roof levels. Furthermore, it is (mainly) a gabled roof. That's how I'd input it in StreetComplete. In OSM, it then becomes:

building:levels=1
roof:levels=2
roof:shape=gabled

However, if you then look at a 3D rendering of it, it will look not at all like the original. This is because the house and garage have been mapped as one building. To achieve a higher detail here, one would have to map the garage as an own building (or building part). Note though, that the data inserted is still correct, only the rendering would be off.
Which is okay really, as these tags can only serve as a very rough approximation of its 3-dimensional shape anyway.

@johnwhelan
Copy link
Author

I think it depends if you are mapping to create a 3D image of it or mapping to get an idea of the square footage or total floor area.

For stats purposes they would consider this a building:level=3 building since it has three floors above the ground level surface. It actually has a large basement but we won't count that.

The house next to it has a ground floor and second floor above it. It also has a gabled roof so stats would think this is building:levels=2 looking for floor area. There is no attic room under the gable roof.

and I think that is where the possible misunderstandings about building and floor levels come from.

Thanks for the insight.

John

@westnordost
Copy link
Member

@johnwhelan
Copy link
Author

Interesting. I wonder if this will change the analysis.

However the most common case will be building levels only.

I might tag the first line as "Building levels"
and the second as "additional floor levels in the roof"

but it depends on space for wording and I'd still run it by Bjenk's editors first. It would also save a mental calculation.

John

@Monduiz
Copy link

Monduiz commented Mar 28, 2017

It can be confusing when adding roofs and basement. The notion of roofs structure is for dedicated mappers. What is important for the general public is building:levels=*. An app like this will appeal to a broader range of users and I would say that its best to keep it simple for them: focusing on the number of floors above ground while avoiding getting the roof into the question.

House -> How many floors above ground? -> 2
bungalow -> How many floors above ground -> 1

A building like the one I am working in would be building:levels=13

For most users, I believe it is easier to understand: number of floors above ground than number of floors inclusive roof.

Great work by the way, the UI is amazing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants