Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No function parameters? #5

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 1, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

No function parameters? #5

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 1, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Unless I'm missing it, it doesn't appear that there is a way to call procedures 
yet, or give them parameters ;)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by liminast...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2012 at 5:15

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

You aren't missing it, Blockly is missing it.  Functions should be callable by 
the end of the day, and parameters should be ready by end of Monday.

Original comment by neil.fra...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2012 at 5:24

  • Changed state: Started

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Nice :) looking great!

Original comment by liminast...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2012 at 5:24

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Neil,

By parameters, are you referring to the LOCAL_VARIABLE support? I started using 
this to build a visual tool for writing code for Second Life. Was able to 
implement the state machine support, a few of the zero parameter events, and a 
bunch of the available commands, and ran head first in to a wall when I was 
trying to create events with parameters because I didn't see anywhere in the 
code that LOCAL_VARIABLE is actually being used to do anything at the moment.

If you are unfamiliar (and for your reference), here's some sample LSL code 
that shows my issue:

default {
  state_entry() {
    llSay(0, "Hello world!");
    state newState;
  }
}
state newState {
  touch_start(integer num_detected) {
    llSay(0, "There are " + num_detected + " people touching me.");
  }
}

Believe it or not, in the first 3 hours of messing with your library, I was 
able to get all of this to work (and with no formal docs... WELL DONE!) with 
only one exception, and that is the adding of num_detected in the second llSay 
using the "create text with" block and "get variable" block.

Here's my code for "touch_start":

Blockly.Language.event_touch_start = {
  category: 'Event',
  helpUrl: 'http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Touch_start',
  init: function() {
    this.setColour(COLOR_EVENT);
    this.addTitle('on touch start');
    this.addInput('store # of touches', '', Blockly.LOCAL_VARIABLE)
      .setText('num_detected');
    this.addInput('do', '', Blockly.NEXT_STATEMENT);
    this.setTooltip('This fires when a touch is first detected.');
    this.setPreviousStatement(true);
    this.setNextStatement(true);
  }
};

Blockly.LSL.event_touch_start = function() {
  var numDetected = Blockly.LSL.variableDB_.getName(this.getVariableInput(0), Blockly.Variables.NAME_TYPE);
  var branch = Blockly.LSL.statementToCode_(this, 1);
  return 'touch_start(integer ' + numDetected + ') {\n' + branch + '}\n';
};

Variables are currently configured in my init and finish sections and seem to 
work fine for globals, but the LOCAL_VARIABLE stuff doesn't seem to add 
variables in a way that variables_get can find them.

Additionally, I was also unable to figure out how to get the "rename variable" 
item in the dropdown to work when added with an addInput of LOCAL_VARIABLE (but 
figured out how to do it with an addTitle dropdown), and was wondering if the 
proper way to add variable data type declarations was with a input/output block 
similar to how you have the math_trig block configured?

I'm really excited to see where this goes, and hope I can continue using it to 
build my visual LSL editor! Keep up the good work! :)

Marc

Original comment by marc.melvin on 2 Jun 2012 at 5:31

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hi Marc, 
Just a quick note, will revisit this tomorrow once I get some sleep.

LOCAL_VARIABLE is currently used in the 'count' and 'for each' loops.  The name 
is actually a lie, all variables are currently globals.  Also, since all 
variables are globals, technically you won't even need parameters since 
anything you set before the call will be there in the function.

Procedure calls are almost ready.

Original comment by neil.fra...@gmail.com on 2 Jun 2012 at 6:43

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Calling procedures is complete.  Procedures with parameters is still to be 
done.  Enjoy!

Original comment by neil.fra...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2012 at 6:20

  • Changed title: No function parameters?

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 32 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by neil.fra...@gmail.com on 13 Jun 2012 at 3:21

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Procedures now have parameters!  r361

Original comment by neil.fra...@gmail.com on 20 Jul 2012 at 6:23

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant