Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Instability with Riemann BC, possibly coupled with periodics? #2218

Closed
rpuenter opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Instability with Riemann BC, possibly coupled with periodics? #2218

rpuenter opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@rpuenter
Copy link

I am trying to simulate a 2.5D airfoil set-up (though the example I show has a cylinder currently). I am trying to reduce the cell count by having the inlet and outlet relatively close to the airfoil (3 and 5 chords respectively). To prevent reflections I'm trying the Riemann BC. The rest of the patches of the box are periodic in such a way that the upper and lower, and front and back patches are communicated.

I get what seems to be a strange even-odd decoupling at the inlet (see screen grab attached). I thought it would be related to #1090, but changing the front and back periodics to symmetry does not fix it, so I assume it must be a problem with the Riemann.

I attach 2 cfg files (one with a steady state with symmetry planes, used to get the initial solution for the unsteadyc, but it also develops the same instability if I set them periodic ) and the gmsh geo file that generates the mesh.

su2bug.zip

System info:

  • OS: Windows 10, Ubuntu wsl2
  • C++ compiler and version: g++ (GCC) 9.4.0
  • MPI implementation and version: OpenMPI 4.0.3, but I'm running serial
  • SU2 Version: 8.0.0
@rpuenter rpuenter added the bug label Feb 20, 2024
@su2code su2code locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 20, 2024
@pcarruscag pcarruscag converted this issue into discussion #2219 Feb 20, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant