Skip to content

Sample implementation of PBFT consensus algorithm

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

sugesslee/consensusPBFT

 
 

Repository files navigation

Sample implementation of various consensus algorithms

PBFT

Architecture

Overall behavior (4 peers)

Definitions of each abbreviation in the diagram are;

  • m: Request message object
  • c: Client ID
  • t: Timestamp
  • v: View ID
  • n: Sequence ID
  • i: Peer(Node) ID
  • r: Result of the request's operation
Why count >= 2 ?

In the diagram, the peer change its state to prepared or committed when the count value, which is the number of verified messages from other peers, is larger than 2. Actually, the condition is count >= 2*f where f is the maximum number of faulty peers, which the network can tolerate. In this case, f is just 1, so the condition is count >= 2.

What is the reply message?

Every node replies the result of the request's operation to the client individually. The client will collect these reply messages and if f + 1 valid reply messages are arrived, the client will accept the result. In this sample implementation, there is no client. So, every node including the primary will return its reply message to the primary.

Code structure of the implementation

Working Screenshot

License

Apache 2.0

About

Sample implementation of PBFT consensus algorithm

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Go 100.0%