You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I tried to test the algorithm over some real-life data. I found the limitation of having a fixed number of labelers a little bit impractical. I wonder if this is a particular implementation limitation or one of the aggregation model? What if a user provide some kind of reasonable upper limit for a task labelers count (3-5-7)? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for your question. It is a limitation of the implementation, not of the model. We will update it to allow for a variable number of annotators per question.
Hi, I tried to test the algorithm over some real-life data. I found the limitation of having a fixed number of labelers a little bit impractical. I wonder if this is a particular implementation limitation or one of the aggregation model? What if a user provide some kind of reasonable upper limit for a task labelers count (3-5-7)? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: