Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

如果有类似 Compare two versions of a PDF file 功能就好了 #4251

Closed
k22725 opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

如果有类似 Compare two versions of a PDF file 功能就好了 #4251

k22725 opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@k22725
Copy link

k22725 commented May 20, 2024

https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/compare-documents.html Acrobat Pro 的 比较文件(Compare two versions of a PDF file)无法全屏(cannot fullscreen)也不能打开epub文件;SumatraPDF虽然能打开epub文件但没有 比较文件(Compare two versions of a PDF file)功能。 Compare two versions of a PDF file 可以很方便地学习外语(把原文pdf和用google翻译过的pdf比较,便于学习英语。很多产品都没有中文说明书,比如一些乐器【MIDI键盘、合成器、音乐制作软件】),或者检查说明书的翻译(很多电子产品都有中英文的介绍,但往往英文部分都有部分错误)是否有错误

@GitHubRulesOK
Copy link
Collaborator

ENGLISH PLEASE (请说英语!?)

https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/compare-documents.html

Acrobat Pro's Compare two versions of a PDF file cannot be full screen or open ePub files;

SumatraPDF can open ePub files, but it does not have the Compare two versions of a PDF file.

Compare two versions of a PDF file is a convenient way to learn a foreign language (compare the original pdf with the pdf translated by Google to learn English.)

Many products do not have Chinese manuals, such as some musical instruments [MIDI keyboards, synthesizers, music production software]), or check the translation of the instructions for errors (many electronic products have Chinese and English introductions, but often the English part has some errors)

@kjk
Copy link
Member

kjk commented May 20, 2024

no plans to do that

@kjk kjk closed this as completed May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants