-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Declass ASDA #42
Comments
@nabobalis |
At the same time? |
No .. no actually I was thinking that declass meant to completely remove the class but now it is ok I have defined the function separately |
What is the reason to define it separately and keep the class? |
I'm just being cautious as I noticed the |
can I work on this? @nabobalis |
Sure. |
@nabobalis I will really glad to work and contribute from my side. It is wrong on my part to not understand the issue completely, could you kindly provide some assistance? |
Hello @010100100100011101010100, currently this issue is being worked on by @Ghaithq. If you want to help, you can ask them otherwise I would suggest another issue. |
@Ghaithq , Could you please explain the issue once clearly? I cannot find the issue specified anywhere? |
Hello @rachelle-hc, do you mean the open pull request addressing this issue? If so that is here: #185 Or would you like a actual concrete issue description? I relassise that I opened this issue with 0 details but I never came back to improve on it. |
Closed by #185 |
When pull request #40 is merged in, it would be worthwhile to declass the code into a series of functions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: