Specify minor version of pydantic to avoid dependency issue

[yuvanist]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix related to #286

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (69f5994) 37.65% compared to head (9258777) 37.65%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #289   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.65%   37.65%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        2284     2284           
=======================================
  Hits          860      860           
  Misses       1424     1424           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[J0]

Thanks!

[yuvanist]

@J0 This PR got merged to the main branch but was not released. Can you do a minor release with the latest main branch?

[olirice]

@yuvanist pinning pydantic to 2.1 has caused problems for us upstream since it makes gotrue-py, postgrest-py and supabase-py incompatible with other popular libraries that use pydantic and have not yet upgraded to 2.0. e.g. Langchain, and FastAPI

see:
supabase-community/supabase-py#517

[olirice]

@J0 I didn't realize this wasn't in a release yet. That's lucky. Please don't cut any more releases until we can revert or add a compatibility layer

[yuvanist]

@olirice that's sad that other libs still in 1.0. Got it.