New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please clarify duplicated controls (overlap, hole size) #4231
Comments
. the first one (overlapping perimeters) allow perimter to be on top of each other when the walls are too thin. for the compensation:
'inner' works for all "holes". |
In 2.5 version I have to use minus to enlarge the hole. Here is a simple model which I use to test how does the slicer behave. It saddens me that such important adjustment is so unreliable. |
I have also noticed that common configuration folder for all versions is a mess. When I open 2.4 and 2.5.59 and 2.5.60, the SS becomes unusable and I have to delete configuration folder. Is there a way to isolate configuration folder for each version? |
NOw that I have deleted configuration folder, 2.5 version in enlarging hole when I go positive at "inner". I don't know if that's related. |
When I delete config again and run 2.5.59.9, the negative is enlarging the hole. This is getting pretty frustrating.
|
PLease make an option for user to chose the option of isolated configuration folder. |
In version 2.5 there are (at least) three instances to set the perimeter overlap. Could someone define the hierarchy and differences of those similar commands? Which setting cancels which? I'm aware that some are more defined per perimeter, but what if they're used simultaneously, and should that be the case?
Let's say this one is a threshold for a thin wall generator. (What does "anti-hysteresis" mean?)
This one could also be a threshold for a thin wall generator.
What's the difference between
perimeter_overlap
and
perimeter_max_overlap
Also, I can see the hole size calibration has (at least) two instances. Moreover, they still work quite erratically. Sometimes it works with minus, sometimes with a plus, sometimes not at all.
Should I use just "inner" or "vertical hole shrinking" ? What if I use both?
Maybe I could test and figure out by myself after some time, but I hope someone familiar with SS code could answer in a heart beat. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: