You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
N..E(1,2,3),[N: (3,2,1)]# should produce(1,2,3),(1,2,3),(1,2,3),[N: (3,2,1)]# and then become1,(1,2,3),(1,2,3),32,(1,2,3),(1,2,3),23,(1,2,3),(1,2,3),1
and
N..E[(1,2,3)],[N: (3,2,1)]# should produce(1,2,3),[N],[N],[N: (3,2,1)]# and then become1,1,32,2,23,3,1
Currently I have it so that only the latter happens in both scenarios, which I don't think is right. The second stage is properly reached, but then after that the [N] bindings get expanded to their variables too soon, destroying the distinction (and I'm not sure how to fix it without reordering everything -- see the if v == ... listcomp lines)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
and
Currently I have it so that only the latter happens in both scenarios, which I don't think is right. The second stage is properly reached, but then after that the
[N]
bindings get expanded to their variables too soon, destroying the distinction (and I'm not sure how to fix it without reordering everything -- see theif v == ...
listcomp lines)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: