Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using FPKM for PECA/TimeReg #14

Open
Chloe-Thangavelu opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Using FPKM for PECA/TimeReg #14

Chloe-Thangavelu opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Chloe-Thangavelu
Copy link

The manual says PECA can use TPM or FPKM as input but FPKM values are not usually used to compare between samples. Is it ok to use FPKM if we intend to use compare_diff or TimeReg, which compare between samples? (Also, for TimeReg, we have to take averages of the RNA replicates, can we do this with FPKMs? Or should we take the averages of the counts first then convert to FPKM?)

@durenzn
Copy link
Member

durenzn commented Aug 1, 2023

For differential expression analysis, people did use count based method like DEseq2 and EdgeR for many years. However, those methods are worse than the simple ranksum test, which take FPKM or CPM as inputs, when the sample size is large. Please see a recent paper from Jingyi Jessica Li’s group: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-022-02648-4

Overall, to perform differential analysis, we just need to use the raw count and normalize it by total read counts, or FPKM/TPM after normalization would work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants