Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re: export / external storage #91

Open
Gus-Fring opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 10 comments
Open

Re: export / external storage #91

Gus-Fring opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 10 comments

Comments

@Gus-Fring
Copy link

Hi Sven, my point was how about letting the user define the path for the external storage? Then I can gather my data on my Onedrive. Now I have to export them one by one.

I also don't understand what changes when checking the automatic export, where to and in which format is the automatic export executed?

One more question: even if I copy .tcx files from another Coxswain app to my '/coxswain' folder, I still need to import the sessions one by one in order to see them under the workout tab?

@dt192
Copy link

dt192 commented Sep 16, 2019

Automatic export, automatically exports the result of each row via whatever method you last used manually. You have to do at least one manual export first so it knows what format.

To move data to a new phone, if you have "store data in external location" turned on, you can backup gym, gym-wal and gym-shm from your coxwain folder, then when you install on the new device, turn on the "store data in external location", then overwrite the 3 files created with the ones you backed up.

@Gus-Fring
Copy link
Author

So the automatic export to Onedrive should already work? Will give it a try.

I have done my first 20 or so workouts without 'store data in external location', suppose this data is not importable into the performance tab? Also, I use Coxswain on two different devices and would like to consolidate data. I can import the workouts, but they don't show in 'Performance', the overwriting solution doesn't really help me here.

@dt192
Copy link

dt192 commented Sep 16, 2019

Try turning on 'store data in external location' and then do one more workout, that seems to update the three external files with the session you just did plus all the previous sessions.

Keep in mind that when you turn the option on it will first create those 3 files empty, which will overwrite what you have in your shared folder, so make sure you have a backup outside the shared folder, assuming it syncs both ways otherwise you'll lose all your data.

I don't think you would be able to consolidate other than importing the tcx files from one side.

@svenmeier
Copy link
Owner

Thanks dt192!

Gus-Fring, all imported workouts are not taken into account for calculating the performance by default.
In Coxswain you can use the context menu on a workout item and toggle evaluate to change that.

@Gus-Fring
Copy link
Author

Thanks, never saw the 'evaluate' option before, works a treat.

Would be nice if there was a user manual so I wouldn't have to bother you with my pesky questions. :-)

Also, bulk import/export features would be nice to have.

But in any case, thanks for a great piece of software, I really appreciate it very much.

@Gus-Fring
Copy link
Author

Gus-Fring commented Sep 20, 2019

I did test the automatic export funtion, it does indeed repeat the last manual export. However, if the last manual operation was an 'Share TCX...' operation, it stores only the activity, not the path. This means it only opends the window where I should specify the path. Would be nice if it stored the path as well and became truly automatic.

@svenmeier
Copy link
Owner

Well, Coxswain doesn't get to know the path you're chosing :(.

Have you considered using some automation like IFTTT to move the file where ever you want.

@Gus-Fring
Copy link
Author

Never worked with IFTTT, not sure how to go about it.

Going back to my initial suggestion: if Coxswain offered the possibility to enter a path to the storage location in the settings menue, wouldn't that solve it?

@svenmeier
Copy link
Owner

Sure, a configurable storage location would solve that. I'm have to think about the implications of that though.

@Gus-Fring
Copy link
Author

Thanks for considering, I am sure this would be really popular.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants