You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By default hygiene gives all bindings a new name with _<number> appended to it. In most cases you can just drop the unique suffix; it is only needed in cases where multiple bindings with the same name mix. In pre 1.0 the --readable-names flag did this.
Adding it back now is probably much easier with the Shift scope analyser.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This discussion has probably happened elsewhere but any reason not to make the --readable-names behavior the default instead and provide a flag to uniquify everything if they want that?
yes I mean obviously the system should optimally check to see if a rename is required and only rename if necessary. none of my macros declare new variables so it seems to work for my purposes.
By default hygiene gives all bindings a new name with
_<number>
appended to it. In most cases you can just drop the unique suffix; it is only needed in cases where multiple bindings with the same name mix. In pre 1.0 the--readable-names
flag did this.Adding it back now is probably much easier with the Shift scope analyser.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: