You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE. Bold: by @KisaragiEffective
I'm worried about this change. It can be read like "I, @limnote, does prohibite use in any form on those ccTLDs."
However, the MIT license promised no limitation for use.
What do you (especially@limonte, @zenflow, and @toverux) think about this? Most of end-users does not notice about this change.
IMHO:
revert this change
or, you change LICENSE and package.json to reflect about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The prohibition might be indeed incompatible with MIT. Instead of prohibiting usage on .ru, .su, .рф ccTLDs, I now clearly describe the different behavior for them: 8dc7174
So, russians are still free to use the plugin and it'll act according to the README 🤗
MIT license said:
I'm worried about this change. It can be read like "I, @limnote, does prohibite use in any form on those ccTLDs."
However, the MIT license promised no limitation for use.
What do you (especially @limonte, @zenflow, and @toverux) think about this? Most of end-users does not notice about this change.
IMHO:
LICENSE
andpackage.json
to reflect about it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: