-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[nll] Unweighted RMS computation #12
Comments
Since changing the RMS computation might be consider a backward inconsistency we could consider to apply this change in the next release of SeisComP when the new NonLinLoc v7 code will land. That is already a big change |
Will NonLinLoc 7 break catalogues by producing different solutions or different error measures? I am fine with changing the way the RMS is being computed, I just don't know how much it will affect current users. Actually the name |
In my comparison tests between current NLL and NLL v7 I got similar results so I expect a transition to NonLinLoc 7 without any backward incompatibilities: neither in behaviour nor in configuration. NLL v7 should be a drop-in replacement to the current version. However I cannot be sure 100% since my testing is limited to my use cases.
That would affect SED for example. So I pointed my collegues to this conversation. However for the sake of consistency I believe we should recompute RMS in a standard way. |
This has been discussed internally at SED and we decided it is not worth changing this metric and it would make future events inconsistent with historical ones. |
Following the discussion in here we should consider if we want to compute the RMS in NLL plugin without weighting the residuals by arrival weight.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: