You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the idea of having stylo be a namespace package that way we can have:
A standard library from stylo.core.xxx import yyy
A number of "core?" extensions from stylo.ext.xxxx import yyy?
Third party packages from stylo.ppp.xxx import yyy
However:
I tried a similar approach with topos and topos-preview and had issues when pip installing them - one package would overwrite the contents of the other making half the code vanish.
Would we get any tangible benefit from doing this?
I like the idea of having
stylo
be a namespace package that way we can have:from stylo.core.xxx import yyy
from stylo.ext.xxxx import yyy
?from stylo.ppp.xxx import yyy
However:
pip install
ing them - one package would overwrite the contents of the other making half the code vanish.Things to investigate more
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: