Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: more verbose documentation #10

Closed
jpjp opened this issue Jan 6, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Suggestion: more verbose documentation #10

jpjp opened this issue Jan 6, 2014 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New features or improvements of some kind, as opposed to a problem (bug) frozen-due-to-age Issues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussion

Comments

@jpjp
Copy link
Contributor

jpjp commented Jan 6, 2014

If the documentation explicitly stated what to do on each separate node (i.e. that the ID is not shared), and that the security comes from having an unguessable node id, then it could reach a stage where a copy and paste setup would be possible.

This might mean that the node id generation part would need a separate --option, like --gen-node-id or similar.

@calmh
Copy link
Member

calmh commented Jan 6, 2014

I.e. a clearer step by step getting started guide?

@jpjp
Copy link
Contributor Author

jpjp commented Jan 6, 2014

Yes. I can write it if you like.

@calmh
Copy link
Member

calmh commented Jan 6, 2014

That would be awesome. I was thinking to move the documentation to the Wiki, perhaps you would like to start on https://github.com/calmh/syncthing/wiki/Getting-Started and I can edit and add to it as necessary?

@jpjp
Copy link
Contributor Author

jpjp commented Jan 6, 2014

Okay done. I didn't make very many changes :) I also updated the output to match the latest release.

@calmh calmh closed this as completed in eebc145 Jan 7, 2014
@eine eine mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2015
8 tasks
@st-review st-review added the frozen-due-to-age Issues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussion label Jun 16, 2017
@syncthing syncthing locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 16, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New features or improvements of some kind, as opposed to a problem (bug) frozen-due-to-age Issues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants