New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backup & Restore #1119
Comments
Is this the same user story from #1118? |
What the heck? Seems like the same description ended up in both. Fortunately, I have the user story save in a text editor as well. :-) I will update now. |
OK, description updated. |
@kcbabo The title is 'Backup & Restore', but the description is about upgrades. Is this intentional ? Not sure whether we actually ever discussed about backup & restore already. |
GitHub did something really weird when I created the upgrade and backup issues. It's almost like the issue description was cached when I created the individual issues as we also had the same issue with integration and infra upgrade issues. Anyway, I just updated the description to be the original text I had. Luckily, I still had it sitting around in a text editor tab. |
So, it's unlucky there have been issues with the details of this story, but I don't see this happening in the scope of tp4. We currently have a light-weight implementation of the broader story, that allows exporting entirely an Integration + all the eventual extensions associated to it. This is happening from the UI. |
@rhuss Do you know where we stand with this? Could you help break down the issue and assess the current state of things? |
There has no work done recently on the Backup/Restore story (although we already know how to backup & restore which is used for doing rollback on failed updates, its just not exposed as 'normal' backups). Our idea is now that we have operators in place to implement Backup/Restore as part of the operator, as much as the the ectd operator does backup and restore. However, since we are currently working on the foundations, this story is not target for 7.1 The alternative would be to expose the way how we do backup/restore as part of the update process to dedicated CLI commands which could be used from the outside. We probably would have to throw away that work later on, but with some pressure could get it into 7.1 (although not until the end of this week). |
I think this issue needs to be part of a larger discussion of how we want to have backup & restore be implemented from a UX POV. One possible solution would be:
|
Migrated to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ENTESB-11551 |
See also https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ENTESB-11551
As an expert integrator, I need the ability to backup and restore a Syndesis environment. Ideally, a single UI or tool can be used to create the backup and restore from backup. In the absence of a tool-driven approach, I need detailed instructions for the create and restore.
DoD:
The backup captures all configuration, history, metrics, logs and any other data available in my Syndesis environment.
Restoring from a backup results in an environment that is identical to the environment the backup was created from.
The feature owner has confirmed one of the following:
-- There is an initial draft of the user doc for this feature.
--The writer acknowledges receiving enough information from engineering to write the initial draft of the user doc for this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: